These films are definitive "cult classics." Neither made an impact in theatres, but through word-of-mouth and fan-driven promotion, both have grossed millions through VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray sales and rentals. Both have also spawned sequels, although only the "Saints" sequel featured the original cast and saw a theatrical release. So, which do you prefer?
I enjoy both for different reasons. "Saints" is a very entertaining, Tarantino-esque crime film, buoyed by a colorful, talented cast. It’s a pity Troy Duffy is a self-destructive douche because he is a talented action/suspense director.
Donnie Darko has, to my personal annoyance, been overwhelmed by its emo/Hot Topic fans. However, the film itself remains a highly original and well-crafted piece of science fiction. And it launced the very promising careers of Jake and Maggie Gyllenhaal.
Overall, I prefer Donnie Darko.
Shotgun Willie (back to normal) says
I’ve only seen about half an hour of The Boondock Saints, but I thought it was just awful. Mindless Tarantino bandwagonning, with some of the most intensely idiotic pseudo-philosophy I’ve ever seen.
Donnie Darko is not my idea of a great movie, but it’s entertaining enough, and enjoyable if you don’t expect it to make a whole lot of sense, from a scientific standpoint.
George M says
I’ve never seen Boondock Saints, but Donnie Darko was indeed quite a cult film. It was a little bit too ambiguous for me, but the film was much more meaningful after I read an analysis about it.
Are you interested in cult films? I think you might find the following analysis interesting: